1. From Chatting to Doing: The Dawn of Invisible Work
The era of 2024–2025 will be remembered as the "request-response" phase of artificial intelligence—a period of innovation stagnation where humans remained tethered to a loop of prompting and waiting. As we enter 2026, we are witnessing the death of the chatbot and the birth of Invisible Work.
Invisible work represents a systemic shift toward autonomous systems that execute workflows on a user’s behalf without constant supervision. We are moving away from AI as a conversational partner and toward AI as a 24/7 digital workforce. The central shift is one of autonomy: your agents will operate while you sleep, gaming systems for your benefit, evaluating their own performance, and executing complex tasks during off-peak hours when compute and electricity are cheapest.
2. Shift 1: Follow the Money — The Scaling Stagnation
A cold look at current capital allocation reveals a hard truth: most funding is fueling replication, not invention. We have entered a "race for evals" where companies spend $1 billion to train a single Large Language Model (LLM) just to marginally beat a competitor's benchmark. This is capital efficiency at its worst.
While the early days of OpenAI were defined by a "dreamer" research approach, the current market is dominated by "me-too" scaling. As Ben Goertzel notes, "The vast chunks of money are going to me-too approaches and just imitating." For the strategic leader, the signal is clear: do not look to the tech giants for a fundamental leap in reasoning in 2026. Real innovation is happening in the "scrappy" spaces—outside the main street of Silicon Valley—where developers are rethinking the fundamental architecture of how these systems reason rather than just making them bigger.
3. Shift 2: The 24/7 Agent and the Resume Arms Race
In 2026, outbound AI will fundamentally alter the relationship between individuals and institutions. Agents will move beyond simple tasks to handle complex, high-stakes interactions:
- Lobbying for Rates: Agents will autonomously negotiate with insurance providers to lower car insurance premiums.
- The Perpetual Job Search: A new mathematical reality has emerged: if an agent can apply for jobs 24/7 without interfering with your current role, why would you ever stop looking?
- Life Administration: Systems will manage medical bill disputes, organize complex logistics, and handle calendar conflicts without human intervention.
This creates a corporate "panic buying" cycle. As companies are flooded with AI-generated resumes and inquiries, they are forced to purchase AI tools just to field the influx. We are entering a world where AI interacts with AI to vet possibilities before two humans ever speak, creating a massive volume of "invisible work" on both sides of the transaction.
4. Shift 3: Runtimes as the New Operating Systems
The most significant technical realization of 2026 is that an agent without a runtime is a toy, not a tool. Building an agent without an Agent Runtime Environment is like trying to run Microsoft Word without a computer or an operating system.
The runtime is where the "complete brain" lives—a blend of deterministic symbolic code (the logical half) and probabilistic generative AI (the planning half). This environment provides the essential infrastructure for institutional scaling. The presence of a runtime is now the ultimate litmus test: if a company isn't talking about infrastructure, they are building in theory, not in practice. A functional runtime must include:
- Event Management: Orchestrating triggers and asynchronous inputs.
- Canonical Knowledge: Ensuring a reconciled, single source of truth.
- Security Guardrails: Hard-coding what an agent is forbidden to do.
- Feedback & Meta-Learning Loops: Allowing the system to test and evaluate itself.
5. Shift 4: The "Layoff Before Automation" Trap
We are seeing a dangerous trend of "panic layoffs" as companies attempt to free up capital for AI investments before their automation is actually functional. Take the recent 15,000-person layoff at Verizon—the largest in its history. The strategic dilemma is stark: do they use that saved capital to fund "free iPhones" to win back subscribers from T-Mobile, or do they invest it in the AI infrastructure required to actually run a leaner business?
The "Pragmatist" warning is simple: automation first, rearrangement second. When you lay off employees before capturing their "tribal knowledge," that information leaves the building forever. Rob Wilson identifies the current "awkward way" of adoption: companies are letting employees use LLMs unofficially so the human remains the "fall guy" for AI hallucinations. This cynical approach avoids institutional accountability but guarantees failure.
The Consultant Litmus Test: Avoid the "Bandwagon Consultant." If a consultant hasn't deployed at least 10 production agents, you are paying for their education. Do not pay to teach a consultant who will then take that institutional knowledge out the door.
6. Shift 5: From RAG to Canonical Knowledge
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is increasingly seen as a primitive solution—essentially "dumping documents into a corpus" and hoping for the best. In 2026, the leaders have moved to Canonical Knowledge Models.
Unlike a CRM, which holds data (email addresses), a knowledge model reconciles concepts into single, unique "cards."
- The Conflict Problem: If an agent sees two documents regarding "who works at this location"—one from last month and one from last year—traditional RAG will often produce conflicting answers.
- The NASA Standard: Following the model pioneered by Roger Forsgren at NASA, knowledge is now a collaborative process where AI and humans reconcile data into a single source of truth. Forsgren’s "litmus test" of quality is clear: the AI-managed version of NASA’s knowledge is now "even better" than the manual version. This structured approach allows organizations to build "agents upon agents" that all draw from the same expert source.
7. Shift 6: Simulation as the Foundation of Trust
In 2026, simulation is a bigger trend than the agents themselves. For a human to hand over their "wallet" and decision-making power to an agent, there must be a foundation of trust. Simulation provides this by allowing agents to:
- Simulate Outcomes: Organizations can test a decision to see how it plays out over ten minutes or ten years before executing.
- Self-Testing Code: Agents will simulate testing the software they write before it ever touches a production environment.
- Physical Practice: Robots will wash ten thousand virtual dishes in a simulated physics environment to learn the task without breaking a single real-world plate.
This creates an "unfair advantage" for companies that can predict outcomes through simulation versus those making choices based on static data and blind faith.
8. Conclusion: The Transparency Imperative
As agents gain access to "wallets"—ordering supplies, booking travel, and managing budgets—the market is shifting away from "pre-built bots" with hidden logic. Users are demanding transparency.
We are entering the era of the Value Algorithm. If you cannot see the decision criteria an agent uses to spend your money, you cannot take responsibility for its actions. Organizations that rely on opaque, advertiser-funded "value algorithms" will face a crisis of trust.
The Final Question: Are we prepared to trust an agent’s decision-making when the underlying logic remains a black box? The future belongs to those who prioritize open-source transparency and robust infrastructure over the "me-too" scaling of the past.
Comments
Post a Comment